Hi Scott,
I recently reached out to you asking why AEW kept the belt on Hangman when Bryan Danielson was way more over. I said he was a better option. You posted my email and essentially called me an idiot. Now, in your recent review of Dynamite, you’re acknowledging the fact that Hangman hasn’t really done anything. Why the change of heart? Did AEW stop paying you?
So because the Archer feud isn’t good that means he’s a failure and they should have cut off his title reign a month in?