Hey Scott, I was listening to a Kurt Angle interview today and made a great point about the current product. With WWE being a publicly traded company, that wants to cater to 5 year olds, does the Heyman and Bischoff tandem really make a difference? I respect Heyman and Bischoff mutually, but, what difference does it make if your PG? Heyman and Bischoff were risk takers dealing with a different rating. PG does not fit for either. Seems like a waste of time as the product will remain the same until WWE realizes PG is no longer going to work. Also, what 5 year old stays up for all 3 hours of RAW?
The product has millions of issues and problems, but being PG is 100% not one of them. I really wish people would let go of this weird fixation with this argument.