Skip to main content
Scott's Blog of Doom!
  • Daily Updates
  • Scott's Rants
  • Headlines
  • Daily Updates
  • Scott's Rants
  • Headlines
  • Observer Flashbacks
  • Mailbag
  • Archives
Scott's Blog of Doom
Rants

Wade Barrett

By Scott Keith on 31 January 2015

Scott,

With the recent podcast on Talk is Jericho & looking back at his stuff around Summerslam 2010, I got thinking about Wade Barrett's potential.

Back then they weren't quite as bad off for main eventers; Taker was still about, Edge wasn't retired, Jericho was back and Cena & Orton weren't quite as stale as they are now. I suppose the need to look forward wasn't as important then.

Even though he was just in the door, would it have been that bad a thing to get behind Barrett back then? He came in as important and had a huge impact on their first night… Obviously Cena neutered them at Summerslam but I felt it was a strong end to 2010 for Barrett with a title win the only thing missing.

Thoughts?

​Keeping in mind that I was literally paying almost ZERO attention to the product around the time of the Nexus angle, I think they should have put him over Orton for the title and lead to the payoff of Cena escaping the Nexus at Wrestlemania by winning the title from Barrett. It would seem to be a pretty obvious and natural direction for the storyline to go, and Barrett was literally a guy developed within the system from day one (well, more or less) so it's not like this was a situation where they couldn't trust someone. ​

Search

Recent Posts

  1. Morning Daily News Update: October 13, 2026 – Max Caster Done With TNA Wrestling Following Controversial Bound For Glory Debut Rants
  2. The Raw Rewind: WWE Monday Night Raw – 10.12.26 Rants
  3. Evening Daily News Update – October 12, 2026 Rants
  4. What the World Was Watching: WWF Monday Night RAW – 08.05.96 Rants
  5. Joshi Spotlight: GAEA Japan in 06.2002 (Here Comes a New Challenger!) Rants
Scott's Blog of Doom!
  • Email Scott
  • Follow Scott on Twitter
© 2026 Scott's Blog of Doom! Read about our privacy policy.