Wrestler off season
By Scott Keith on 2 May 2014
Would you see the benefits of WWE requiring all their wrestlers to only wrestle 9 months a year? IMO, they should introduce more wrestlers but only keep 75% of the their active roster on television at any given time so they could continue to have no real off season. This would help wrestlers have longer careers and keep their characters fresher. What is the downside to this? Do we need to see Kofi Kingston 12 months a year?
People have been rallying for this idea for years now and it's always been a fantastic idea. Keeps everyone fresh, as noted, and look at what a few months off does for making even boring guys like Sheamus seem new and different again when they return. It's just like how guys would cycle in and out of the territories years ago, leaving before they get boring.