So what do you guys want to talk about? How about we talk about Dave openly admitting he is sorry that reporting factual news made things worse for the CM Punk/AEW situation. Isn't the whole point of being a journalist reporting news regardless of whether it makes someone upset or not? Also, why did he sit on this news for so long as well, to help Tony? And why when he finally let's it go he omits half the story. Maybe he wanted to make Punk look bad and help the Elite's imagine cause they free agents this year? It doesn't even make sense how he left out a huge part of the story of Punk not being cleared. And he sounded like distraught he caused this uproar right after AEW had the big Vikingo match and overshadowed it. That seems like a weird way for a journalist to act about reporting news.
The worst part is he released the news randomly while arguing in the forums. How was that not in the newsletter the last few months thats supposed to, you know, contain news. He constantly brags about having the most coverage on this story from all sides, but held back parts? And is sorry he released it, not that he withheld a big part of it? This pretty much validates what alot has been said about him being biased. He has zero problems releasing news that may cause problems in WWE. Even when he asked Bryan for his opinion Bryan wanted no part of it. Basically neither wanted to touch a subject that is one of most discussed topics today because its bad for AEW. So if you are paying for the WON grift you should now understand your paying for one guy who is sorry he reported the news, and the other who is too scared to give an opinion on one promotion.
I am sure you will no sell this but curious what the blog thinks.
LOL, “the WON grift”. OK then.