These days, I've noticed on the blog that people get really upset about your ratings and Dave's ratings. Most of us understand it's just your opinion — but — I've been reading you since 1999 and many of the matches in my head are synonymous with your star-rating. And I'm often curious how you come to the conclusions you come to. I genuinely mean this in a fun, constructive way, not in a way that's going to remove any of the fun. This isn't like “explain why the joke is funny!” More just you openly discussing how you rate matches.
So, for example, I recently watched Omega/Tanahashi from WrestleKingdom 13. You gave it 6 1/2 stars. I would give it four stars. It was a good match. I thought Tanahshi was quite sloppy, and the match never got into a groove. Plus, Tanahashi works Omega's knee, but then Omega no-sells it and spams his V-triggers. Would you ever be open to having a weekly feature on your site where you defend your star ratings like this? Could be fun!
I guarantee you that you have put more thought into my star ratings than I have at any point in the past decade. I just rate stuff how I feel like in the moment and move on with my life.